
Columbiad wrote:But why continue to fill a land with material that isn't theme-perfect and when there is plenty other material to draw on that better fits the theme of the land? Keep Star Tours and upgrade it - I'm happy with that. But adding more (I feel) would be sacrificing the brilliant, unique design and concept that Discoveryland has.


Lorum wrote:I don't want Discoveryland to be destroyed. There are several ways of expanding a park. They should think of "The Little Mermaid", "Splash Mountain".


BadKid wrote:Lorum wrote:I don't want Discoveryland to be destroyed. There are several ways of expanding a park. They should think of "The Little Mermaid", "Splash Mountain".
I agree.


JelleP wrote:BadKid wrote:Lorum wrote:I don't want Discoveryland to be destroyed. There are several ways of expanding a park. They should think of "The Little Mermaid", "Splash Mountain".
I agree.
I couldn't agree more...
Especially the first sentence: "I don't want Discoveryland to be destroyed!"


Scissorsboi wrote:Surely by taking that whole area at once and making it visibly different and flowing as one then it will address that problem, you will have Discoveryland with it's Verne style (and Buzz would then become the obvious flaw to the land) and Star Wars Land (which I hope isn't called that if it goes ahead..) would be one flowing area. It'd remove a lot of the mish-mash of themes we've been left with as additions were tacked on without much thought.


Anthony wrote:Scissorsboi wrote: In the same way Adventureland is a single land of "Adventure" themes but contains wildly different locales such as the bazaar, Africa, India and the Caribbean.



Columbiad wrote:I rephrase my opinion - if it was going to be done, it would have to done really well. The various area's in Adventureland work because of the one overarching feature they share - the greenery. The jungle greenery blends the area together, with subtle changes suggesting the various locales. But Discoveryland doesn't have that - Discoveryland is mostly architectural and it would be much, much harder to blend the warm, coppery Victorian retro-future with the cold, industrial white style of the Star Wars universe.
This is why I think it'd be better to use that space for more Mysterious Isle-style features, which is already perfect.

Columbiad wrote:But Discoveryland doesn't have that - Discoveryland is mostly architectural and it would be much, much harder to blend the warm, coppery Victorian retro-future with the cold, industrial white style of the Star Wars universe.

Scissorsboi wrote:Surely by taking that whole area at once and making it visibly different and flowing as one then it will address that problem, you will have Discoveryland with it's Verne style (and Buzz would then become the obvious flaw to the land) and Star Wars Land (which I hope isn't called that if it goes ahead..) would be one flowing area. It'd remove a lot of the mish-mash of themes we've been left with as additions were tacked on without much thought.





|Q| wrote: They could just try to restyle the exterior of Buzz's attraction, giving him a more steampunk look:





Columbiad wrote:|Q| wrote: They could just try to restyle the exterior of Buzz's attraction, giving him a more steampunk look:
That'd be amazing.









dagobert wrote:Doesn't Mysterious Island look great? I wish DLP's Discoveryland would be more like that.






Users browsing this forum: capitalbarbie and 1 guest